Call Us Today: 604-468-8900
Schedule An Appointment With Us 604-468-8900
Garton & Harris
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Philip J. Dadson
    • Stuart F. Ross
    • Patrick Verrier
  • Wills and Estates
    • Estate Planning
    • Wills
    • Powers of Attorney
    • Representation Agreements, Living Wills
    • Trusts
    • Probate and Estate Administration
      • Probate With And Without A Will
    • Will Challenges
  • Business Transactions
    • Buying Or Selling A Business
    • Incorporation Or Setting Up A Business
  • Litigation
    • Business Disputes
    • Construction Disputes
  • Real Estate
    • Residential Purchase And Sale
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Property Development
      • Subdivision
    • Foreclosures
  • Family Law
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu

Class certification for class action lawsuits

March 23, 2015/in Class Action Litigation /by gartonandharris

When two or more people wish to sue the same defendant for the defendant’s wrongful actions in British Columbia, they may do so either separately or instead try to file a class action civil lawsuit. Provincial law outlines the procedure plaintiffs seeking to file a class action lawsuit must go through in order to file.

The Class Proceedings Act requires those seeking to file as a class must first seek certification from the court. The pleading must identify a minimum of two or more people with common or similar issues and a clearly identifiable cause of action. Their must also be a plaintiff who can fairly and appropriately represent the interests of the other class members. The representative plaintiff must also have a plan to identify and contact class members, and they cannot have any conflict with another class member’s issue.

The court considers several factors when determining whether a class action lawsuit is the preferable manner in which to proceed. Whether the common issues predominate over other individual ones and whether other approaches to resolve the issues would be less efficient are both factors for certification. The court will also consider whether a large number of class members would have valid interests in separate prosecutions as well as whether the class action would involve claims that have already been litigated.

Class action litigation is sometimes preferable to filing a large number of separate lawsuits against the same defendant. Class members whose interests are represented by the representative plaintiff may benefit due to the better efficiency provided by class certification. People who are considering filing a lawsuit against a defendant and who believe there are more possible plaintiffs may want to speak to a lawyer about their options.

https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png 0 0 gartonandharris https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png gartonandharris2015-03-23 00:00:002015-03-23 00:00:00Class certification for class action lawsuits

Grounds for appeal of a criminal conviction

March 17, 2015/in Federal Appeals /by gartonandharris

In British Columbia, the grounds for appealing a federal conviction are governed by Criminal Code sections 674 and 675. Valid grounds for appeal vary based on the specifics of the case, conviction and defendant. The rules are different, for example, if the case was decided on summary conviction or by regular verdict.

A person who has been convicted in trial court proceedings may file a federal appeal against the conviction on any ground involving a question of law or any ground involving a question of fact or of mixed fact and law if they have leave of court or another certification that the case is proper for appeal. The appeals court may determine that valid grounds for appeal exist in other cases as well.

A person may file an appeal following a second-degree murder conviction if he or she was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole for more than ten years. On appeal, the court will consider the appropriateness of the length of the no-parole period. Similarly, a person may appeal the length of parole ineligibility if he or she was under 18 years of age at the time of the offence and was convicted of first- or second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for a number of years greater than the minimum required by law.

Those who have been convicted in trial court proceedings may appeal the sentence, with leave of court, in many cases. A lawyer with experience in federal appeals may be able to assist a person after conviction by examining the facts of the case to see if there are grounds for appeal. An attorney may be able to draft and file the documents necessary or argue on behalf of a client before the court of appeals.

https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png 0 0 gartonandharris https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png gartonandharris2015-03-17 00:00:002015-03-17 00:00:00Grounds for appeal of a criminal conviction

Challenging a will in British Columbia

March 12, 2015/in Wills /by gartonandharris

In some cases, after a loved one has passed, family members may be shocked at a will that was left behind. You may question whether your loved one validly executed the will, and you may not know what to do to challenge seemingly unfair or nonsensical distributions of assets.

Provincial law allows people to challenge a will. A common ground for a challenge may include situations in which the requisite number of witnesses to the will or proper signatures were not met. You may also have concerns that your loved one was coerced into writing a will for the benefit of the person influencing them to do so, or that they did not have the mental capacity needed to draft the will at the time it was written.

Other problems with wills that may lead to challenges include those that do not sufficiently provide for a spouse and children who are left behind. If the document fails to include provisions for assets that are outside of the will but which were intended to be distributed to certain beneficiaries, this might also be grounds for a challenge. In some cases, you may also be unhappy with the actions of the trustee or estate administrator and believe they should be removed or replaced.

At Garton & Harris, our lawyers experienced in helping their clients with will challenges. We understand that challenging a will after a loved one’s death may stir heightened emotions combined with grief, and we try to approach each client’s case accordingly. Our firm is also familiar with the type of evidence that is needed in order to mount a successful will challenge, and we may be able to help our clients gather the needed documentation to support their cases. Will challenges often bring many questions, and so we have compiled information to help our potential clients. If you would like to learn more, you may want to review our page that discusses will challenges.

https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png 0 0 gartonandharris https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png gartonandharris2015-03-12 00:00:002020-09-18 21:11:08Challenging a will in British Columbia

Safety deposit boxes and estate administration

March 5, 2015/in Estate Administration & Probate /by gartonandharris

When a person in British Columbia dies, leaving behind a safety deposit box leased or rented either solely in his or her name or shared with another person, the law provides how the box should be opened and handled. This is important to ensure that the contents of the safety deposit box are correctly accounted for and included in the deceased person’s estate.

The institution where the safety deposit box is located is not able to let people remove the box or its contents from the location until either the estate’s representative or the other person whose name is also on the lease comes to the institution. The representative or co-owner must then prepare an inventory of the contents of the box in the presence of a person who is in control of where the box is held. He or she must leave a copy of that inventory inside of the box before removing the contents of it.

If a will is contained inside of the safety deposit box, the estate representative may remove the will after preparing the inventory. The inventory must be left in the safety deposit for at least 12 months, and a copy of it must also be kept by the person in control of the location for 12 months as well.

Although people may not think about what will happen to safety deposit boxes following death, many people keep copies of their wills, other important documents and valuables in them. Laws concerning estate administration are very specific in order to protect the assets of the estate. In that way, people can be assured their assets will pass to the people to whom they intend. If a person has a safety deposit box, they may want to inform their wills and estates lawyer of its location and contents while completing their estate plan.

https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png 0 0 gartonandharris https://gartonandharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/garton-and-harris-logo-full-02.png gartonandharris2015-03-05 00:00:002020-09-18 21:11:20Safety deposit boxes and estate administration

Categories

  • Blog
  • Civil Appeals
  • Civil Litigation
  • Class Action Litigation
  • Estate Administration & Probate
  • Federal Appeals
  • Power of Attorney
  • Uncategorized
  • Wills

Recent Posts

  • Are do-it-yourself wills worth the risk?
  • What can go wrong when buying a business in Canada?
  • How to “stress test” a will throughout one’s life
  • Are wills necessary if all assets have joint ownership?
  • How should individuals update their wills following a divorce?

Archives

  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014

Schedule An Appointment With Us

SEND US AN EMAIL

© 2020 by Garton & Harris. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy

REVIEW OUR FIRM
Scroll to top